Comments on: About Us

By: Justine Villanueva

Justine Villanueva — Sun, 18 Jul 2010 01:53:00 +0000

We need more people who care for the environment. This is not just for us but also for future generations! Think of the kind of planet you want your kids to live in the future.

By: Eldridge Cortijo

Eldridge Cortijo — Mon, 12 Jul 2010 00:18:10 +0000

try it best .

By: automation

automation — Fri, 11 Jun 2010 14:11:13 +0000

Climate change is a global problem, and yet each one of us has the power to make a difference. Even small changes in our daily behaviour can help prevent greenhouse gas emissions without affecting our quality of life. In fact, they can help save us money!

By: 899

899 — Thu, 06 May 2010 21:56:59 +0000

I have a suggestion:

I like your video, and there’s another song which you might use as well: The Candy Man Can

http://lyricsplayground.com/alpha/songs/c/candymanvarious.shtml

Taking proper artistic license, you could cook up a dandy new video!

By: Dan Princinsky

Dan Princinsky — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:23:57 +0000

The reason for cap and trade legislation has nothing to do with reducing carbon emissions or energy efficiency. I worked for Honeywell in the mid seventies when the government gave them 300 Million dollars to study solar energy. Quote from the results of the study ” the most effecient use fo solar energy is to grow trees and burn the wood”!

The purpose of the cap and traade bill is to raise the cost of energy in order to make the return on investment in alternative sources look more attractive.

I have 35 years in energy and 8 to 10 year return on investment for alternate sources are not acceptable. Think about it, the majority of companies want areturn on investment of less tan One Year. Fromaa residential standpoint most people do not own the same home long enough to get a return on their investment.

Itt is like thee increase in fuel mileage, the claim is that though is cost more for the car over the life of the vehicle it is pays off. What is the life of the vehicle? How many people keep the same car long enoough to see the return? If anything this will lead people to purchase used vehicles where the loss of the upfront cost have been absorbed!!
Wake Up America stop trusting these idiots and study thee issues so they cannot fool yoy.

By: Jack H

Jack H — Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:18:36 +0000

We would be very interested in helping you with pre-trial jury research should this go to trial. It will be very important for you to be able to identify biased jurors who, being imposters, posers, and fabricators (like Obama and the rest of the democrats) will try to get on your jury to sabotage the Verdict in your favor. You will need a way to identify such jurors without relying on the obvious bias questions, as you can expect the brainwashed to lie to get on the panel.

In the interest of seeing this matter tried in a court of law, I would suggest you make more videos and include more or the AGW liars. — The more of them you can bait into a lawsuits, the better. You might also wish to review your files and the blessed emails to see if there isn’t already grounds for libel /defamation suits against the LIARS of AGW.— From the sample of emails I’ve read, it seemed like various scientists were libeled and defamed (to other scientists) and caused them to suffer damages. Libel /defamation lawsuits would give you the Discovery you’re hoping for. So why wait for the LIARS/Fraudsters to file. Take the war to the enemy.

There should also be grounds for Qui Tam lawsuits: These liars received U.S. Govt. Funds to conduct scientific research. What they did instead was attempt, under the color of science, to defraud the entire country, indeed, the entire world.

The nice thing about Qui Tam suits is that you could force the universities to pay the damages for sponsoring these fraudulent “scientific” activities.

The challenge in a Qui Tam suit would be find people in the Govt. to go along and accept the case. — You might have to wait until the 2012 for the Qui Tam solution, when the Justice Department has been cleansed of all the Obama-Nazis.

By: Shayne Edwards

Shayne Edwards — Mon, 26 Apr 2010 19:50:59 +0000

To see a nice rebut to Al Gore’s film, check out the trailer for a real piece of truth for the upcoming documentary called “An Inconsistent Truth” here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CHQJyJcyUGA

By: Henk

Henk — Wed, 21 Apr 2010 04:56:13 +0000

Thank you for confirming what Europeans already surmised about the majority of Americans. Your God will give you what you deserve.

By: Larry Butler

Larry Butler — Fri, 08 Jan 2010 05:46:37 +0000

Paul, the ice caps melt EVERY summer and refreeze EVERY winter. Japanese scientists of the JAXA satellite system have been plotting it for you since 2002. http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm Please notice each year’s minimum except for an anomaly caused by the Jet Stream in 2007 draws right over the other years. 2009 drew on top of 2006. Every December, including 2007, the lines of the chart all converge at virtually the same values. To listen to the Global Warming Religion, each line on this chart should be lower and lower since 2002 and NEVER intersect. It’s a lie.

Go here: http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/cgi-bin/seaice-monitor.cgi
Now, look at the SAME DAY in every year from 2002 to 2010, say Jan 5th. See the ice simply disappear the later you get? No? Why not! You must need glasses! Anybody can see the whole arctic ice sheet has just disappeared from Jan 2002 to Jan 2010. Of course, I’m being sarcastic. You can watch the change from year to year. Many charts from very respected places are a lie because the truth isn’t “on message” to tow us into global taxes from a global government.

Algore just bought a multimillion dollar condo in downtown San Francisco very near to the classy wharf area that will be 25 feet deep in seawater if what HE tells you ever comes true? Why would he waste $Millions like that if he actually believed the lie? What more proof do you need?

By: Peter

Peter — Sun, 27 Dec 2009 01:40:29 +0000

I disagree. Cap and trade is a hidden tax: or your “lie”. A fee-and-dividend approach is simple, visible and honest.

“Cap-and-trade is the antithesis of this simple system. Cap-and-trade is a hidden tax, increasing energy costs, but with no public dividend. Its infrastructure costs the public, who also fund the profits of the resulting big banks and speculators. Cap-and-trade is advantageous only to energy companies with strong lobbyists and government officials who dole out proceeds from pollution certificates to favoured industries.”

“The entire fee collected from fossil fuel companies should be distributed to the public. In this fee-and-dividend approach people maintaining a carbon footprint smaller than average will receive more in the dividend than they pay via increased energy costs. The monthly dividend, deposited electronically in their bank account or on their debit card, will stimulate the economy and provide people with the means to increase their carbon efficiency.”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/dec/27/james-hansen-copenhagen-agreement-opportunities